#16: Precision Practice: A Clinician's Playbook for 2026

Precision medicine was supposed to mean better targeting, smarter interventions, clearer decisions.

But lately, precision has looked more like accumulation - more tools, more interventions, more data points to reconcile before you can think straight.

That's not precision. That's drift.

The clinicians we’re watching in 2026 aren't doing more. They're refining - tighter sequencing, clearer boundaries with AI, sharper judgment about what deserves their attention and what doesn't. They're building practices that reflect their clinical thinking, not just the defaults of whatever software they inherited.

What follows isn't prediction - it's a playbook. Ten shifts that amplify the modern clinician from the noise.

Here's where we’re focusing this year:

In 2025, it became normal to layer intervention on top of intervention—GLP-1s, peptides, hormones, supplements—often faster than evidence or guidelines could keep up.

In 2026, the strongest clinicians will shift their focus. Not what else can I add? but what should come first, what should wait, and what can be removed?

Sequencing—not novelty—will become the signal of maturity.

In 2026, the debate about whether clinicians should use AI largely ends. The more important question becomes where it stops.

High-functioning practices will be explicit: AI summarizes, surfaces patterns, and handles routine operations—but judgment, tradeoffs, and final decisions remain human and traceable.

As AI moves beyond screening and documentation into treatment support, this boundary matters more. Not can a system suggest an intervention—but who owns the decision when it does?

Clarity here won’t come from regulation. It will come from clinicians deciding what they are—and are not—willing to delegate.

Something subtle but meaningful is changing.

More clinicians are beginning to shape their tools instead of contorting their practice around them. Not by becoming engineers, but by using systems that let them configure workflows, protocols, follow-ups, and patient experiences without waiting on vendors or workarounds.

This isn’t about writing code. It’s about reclaiming intent.

In 2026, the most empowered clinicians will be able to:

As tools become more flexible, practices will start to reflect the clinician’s judgment more clearly—not just the defaults of the software they use.

Access to information is no longer scarce. Judgment is.

When everyone has the same studies, models, and tools, differentiation moves upstream—to how clinicians weigh imperfect evidence, explain uncertainty, and decide when not to intervene.

In 2026, excellence will look steady. Patients will feel it in how decisions are explained, not how fast they’re made.

Clinicians are done stitching together stacks.

In 2026, practices will actively remove tools—not because they failed, but because managing them became its own form of burnout.

The systems that win won’t do more things. They’ll do fewer things without handoffs, exports, duplicate data entry, or lost context.

This shift won’t be driven by elegance. It will be driven by exhaustion—and by the reality that fewer external forces will paper over operational messiness.

Behind the scenes, roles are already shifting.

As AI absorbs documentation and synthesis, the real constraint in care becomes experienced judgment per patient, not visit volume. That pushes practices to rethink:

In 2026, the most effective clinics won’t just adopt new tools—they’ll redesign how clinical labor is deployed across time.

This will matter more than headcount.

Payment rails matter more than protocols.

As patients shoulder more financial responsibility and employers look for predictability, care models that reward continuity, availability, and longitudinal thinking will keep growing.

At the same time, prevention-focused care and outcome-based accountability are converging in practice—not because philosophies aligned, but because the math demands it.

When incentives favor staying with patients longer, clinicians can afford to think further ahead.

Whether clinicians like it or not, consumer behavior is changing how care is experienced.

Patients now arrive with AI-generated lab interpretations, wearable-driven narratives, and strong views on environment, nutrition, toxins, and longevity timelines.

What’s changing in 2026 isn’t interest—it’s expectation. Patients increasingly assume someone will help them:

Clinics that ignore this will feel reactive.

Clinics that translate it into grounded guidance will become anchors of health for these patients. 

Fragmented care has always had a cost - it just wasn't always visible.

In 2026, patients will feel the difference between a practice where their labs, imaging, prescriptions, and follow-ups connect, and one where they're stitching it together themselves between visits.

Coherence isn't a luxury anymore. It's what separates the practices patients stay with from the ones they leave.

When the intake, the workup, the intervention, and the follow-through all reflect a single clinical logic, patients trust the process. When they don't, even good interventions feel scattered.

The modern clinician builds for coherence - not because it's elegant, but because outcomes depend on it.

We’re entering a sorting phase.

One path will optimize for visibility: bold claims, constant novelty, fast scaling.

The other will optimize for repeatability: clear reasoning, stable systems, and outcomes that hold up over time.

The first path will get more attention.

The second will build practices clinicians actually want to work in.

Our posture for 2026:

The modern clinician isn't adding more. They're building better systems that encode judgment, workflows that hold, and practices that amplify signals for the patients who trust them. That's precision practice in 2026. 

Dr. Fady Shmouni—endocrinologist, geneticist, professor at UBC, and founder of Dr. Vibe—believes the next critical skill for clinicians isn’t just using AI, but building with it.

After years of frustration with slow, expensive outsourced software builds, Dr. Shmouni began experimenting with AI-assisted coding and quickly built hormonally.ai, a multi-agent evidence engine for hormones and peptides, in under 48 hours. That experience convinced him that clinicians—who understand healthcare problems better than anyone—should be able to design their own solutions.

With Dr. Vibe, he teaches clinicians and medical trainees how to move beyond ChatGPT into vibe coding: using natural language to build dashboards, workflows, calculators, analytics tools, and internal business software tailored to their own practices. The goal isn’t to turn doctors into engineers, but to expand AI literacy, reduce operational friction, and give clinicians ownership over the tools they rely on.

Dr. Shmouni is clear that human-in-the-loop matters. The biggest wins today are business and workflow tools that lower costs and complexity, while more advanced clinical systems require caution, oversight, and guardrails. His mission is simple: help clinicians stop feeling like technology is happening to them—and start shaping it themselves.

Even a small build can permanently change how you approach AI—and how much agency you feel in a rapidly changing clinical landscape.

Get ahead in 2026 with Vibrant, the AI-powered, all-in-one EHR built specifically for personalized medicine. Schedule a demo with our team to learn more about how we can help you extend your clinical brain and deliver great personalized care.

STAT calls for AI competency standards in medical training by 2026. A Dartmouth professor argues that patients are already arriving with AI-generated questions, and physicians who treat patients without consulting validated AI tools will soon find their decisions difficult to defend. The piece calls for ACGME to mandate AI competency standards and for medical schools to replace AI bans with AI protocols. For modern clinicians, the question isn't whether to use AI - it's how to use it without ceding clinical judgment.

Doximity launches PeerCheck with Eric Topol and Regina Benjamin Former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Regina Benjamin and Eric Topol are co-editing PeerCheck, a physician-led peer review initiative for DoxGPT. The piece argues that AI "cannot replace clinical judgment, context, or lived experience" and that peer review - long the safeguard for medical advances - has been missing from AI deployment. They're convening an AI Editorial Board to bring physician oversight into clinical AI. 

HHS issues RFI on accelerating AI adoption in clinical care HHS is seeking public input on how to accelerate AI in clinical care using three levers: regulation, reimbursement, and R&D. Comments due February 23, 2026. The RFI signals the administration's intent to establish a "predictable, proportionate-to-risk" regulatory posture for clinical AI. 

The Modern Clinician is written for functional, integrative, and longevity-focused physicians who want to scale their impact and deliver cutting-edge care.

If you liked this one, share it with a colleague! We appreciate you spreading the word.

To learn more about the why behind this newsletter, start with our first post introducing The Modern Clinician.