Why the clinicians who benefit most from AI scribes are the ones who need them most, and what that means for functional, integrative, and longevity medicine.

There is a quiet tax on modern medicine, and it rarely shows up on a spreadsheet. It shows up after dinner, when the laptop opens again, and the glow of the EHR replaces the rhythm of conversation. For many clinicians, “pajama time” now exceeds 11 hours per week. Documentation consumes more than half of clinical time, forcing a daily tradeoff between listening deeply and typing efficiently.

For functional, integrative, and longevity-focused practices, the burden is often heavier. Longer visits, multi-system analysis, and nuanced protocols generate richer care—but also more complex notes. Over time, that friction erodes presence and fuels burnout.

AI documentation tools are finally offering a meaningful release valve.

The concept is not new. Clinicians have used human scribes for over a decade, and the evidence is consistent — offloading charting works. Post-clinic EHR time dropped by roughly 50% in academic settings, satisfaction scores climbed, and burnout fell across specialties. There are real benefits to having another person in the room — someone who tracks the narrative in real time and catches details you might miss while examining or thinking. That relational, in-the-moment support is valuable, and it is worth noting that the future of agentic AI clinical workflows is actively working toward that same level of contextual understanding and compatibility. The limitation of human scribes was never the quality of support. It was the cost, the training, the turnover, and the difficulty of scaling that model — particularly for smaller or independent practices in functional and integrative medicine.

In our breakdown of the evolving copilot stack, we described the first and most practical layer: the scribe.

Tools such as Freed, DeepScribe, and Sunoh.ai passively listen during visits and generate structured SOAP notes in real time. Instead of simultaneously typing notes while tracking what the patient is saying, or reconstructing the encounter from memory, clinicians review and refine a nearly complete draft that often captures more of what the patient is saying than any human could.

The data now spans hundreds of thousands of encounters. Here is what the numbers show:

Within the AMA's large-scale analysis, a finding worth considering: clinicians who benefited most from AI scribes were those who used them consistently and had the heaviest documentation burden to begin with. The highest-use clinicians saw more than double the time savings per note compared to lower-frequency users.

This is not a coincidence. It is a structural match. Functional, integrative, and longevity medicine practitioners routinely generate the longest, most complex notes in outpatient medicine. Multi-system assessments, layered supplement and peptide protocols, longitudinal biomarker analysis, lifestyle interventions — these visits produce documentation that conventional care templates were never designed to capture.

In other words, if you are the clinician who spends the most time on notes, you are exactly the clinician who stands to reclaim the most time from an AI scribe. And the return compounds with consistency — the more you use the tool, training it to your style and refining its output, the more time it gives back.

At 20–30 minutes per day reclaimed, that is roughly 2–3 workweeks per year returned to you — not to more charting, but to the complex conversations, the follow-up questions, and the unhurried presence that define this kind of medicine.

The most effective approach is a focused two-week pilot. Start with one or two clinicians and a defined subset of visits—follow-ups are often easiest. Activate the scribe at the start of the encounter and review each note before signing.

During this period, track three metrics:

Equally important, create a lightweight review protocol. Edit phrasing. Correct patterns. Refine structure. These systems learn from your feedback, and early iterations align the output with your clinical voice. Remember — the data shows that consistent use is a predictor of time savings.

Within fourteen days, you will know whether it meaningfully changes your day.

The real dividend of an AI scribe is not just time — it is presence. When you are not typing continuously, eye contact returns, conversations go deeper, and patients feel heard rather than processed. For practices built on trust and experience, reducing the screen barrier is a strategic advantage, not a convenience.

But that advantage depends on how you use the tool. At OvationLab, we have identified a set of core AI clinical skills that separate clinicians who get marginal benefit from those who transform their workflow. Several of them apply directly to scribe use.

Practice ambient communication. This is the skill of speaking naturally during the encounter while structuring your language in a way the scribe can capture accurately — verbalizing your clinical reasoning, assessments, and next steps in real time rather than thinking silently and reconstructing later. It produces a more complete draft, it reinforces transparency with the patient, and it reduces the editing you need to do afterward. This is not performing for the AI. It is narrating care the way you already think through it, out loud.

Build AI error vigilance into your review. AI drafts. You decide. Every note should be treated as a first draft that needs your clinical eye. Check that the assessment matches your reasoning. Look for hallucinated details or overstated claims. Confirm the plan reflects what was actually discussed. This is the skill that prevents documentation automation from sliding into competency compression — the gradual erosion of clinical rigor when outputs go unchecked. Never sign what you have not read and refined.

Use iterative refinement to train the tool to your voice. Correct phrasing. Adjust structure. Flag patterns the scribe gets wrong. These systems improve with feedback, and the clinicians who invest in early refinement are the ones who see compounding returns — better drafts, less editing, faster close-out.

Document consent. Most AI scribe platforms provide consent language and workflows for ambient listening. Make sure verbal or written consent is captured in the note for every encounter. This protects both the patient and the practice, and it normalizes the technology as part of your clinical process rather than something happening in the background.

Watch where this is heading. Today's scribe captures the visit. Tomorrow's agentic workflows will act on it — generating referral orders, scheduling follow-ups, queuing lab requisitions, and completing tasks directly from the plan. The friction mapping you do now — identifying the clicks, the redundant steps, the places where your workflow still drags — is what positions your practice for that next layer. The future is not just fewer minutes spent documenting. It is fewer clicks to close the chart entirely.

Mastering AI documentation is not about chasing trends. It is a structural upgrade. It moves evenings back into personal time. It shifts visits back into relational space. It reallocates cognitive energy from transcription to strategy.

But the tool alone is not the unlock. The clinicians seeing the greatest return are the ones building real fluency — practicing ambient communication, applying AI error vigilance to every note, and refining the system until it mirrors their clinical voice. These are not nice-to-haves. They are the skills that separate adoption from transformation.

From pajama time to patient time is not a slogan. It is an operational shift that can be measured within weeks.

The question is not whether AI can write your notes. It is whether you are ready to reclaim the hours they have been quietly taking.

In this week’s How I AI, Stacy Marie Ronquillo, NP, founder of Remedy Functional Medicine in Portland, shares how she uses an AI scribe to transform complex lab review visits.

Her lab reviews run 90 minutes and used to require another 60–90 minutes of documentation. Now, with a highly customized template inside her AI scribe, she captures not just what she says — but how she thinks.

Over months of refining her template, the system began to reflect her clinical reasoning. When she explains connections between biomarkers, rules out differentials, or walks through root-cause logic, the AI translates that into structured chart notes and clear after-visit summaries.

The result:

Her key insight? AI doesn’t work perfectly out of the box. It requires iteration. But once it learns your voice and reasoning style, it becomes an extension of your workflow — not just a transcription tool.

As we’ve written before in AI in Clinical Practice: Your Competitive Edge in Personalized Medicine  — AI handles synthesis. You provide judgment.

When implemented well, it restores humanity to the visit:

Choose one repeat visit type and build a structured AI template for it. Run 5 visits through it, refine aggressively, and track your charting time.

The goal isn’t perfection. It’s alignment.

We track labs, CGM data, sleep, genetics — but what about the home your patient lives in?

This week, we’re joined by Lightwork Home Health to explore how environmental exposures can be integrated into personalized, data-informed care.

We’ll cover:

Environmental factors are often the hidden variable in fatigue, inflammation, and complex chronic cases. It’s time to expand the lens.

If you’re building a practice grounded in precision and prevention, join us.

Amazon One Medical adds AI-powered lab explanations to its app. The company launched “Health Insights,” a feature that translates lab results into plain-language summaries for patients inside the One Medical app. Instead of raw reference ranges, patients receive contextual explanations and suggested next steps. The signal here isn’t just better UX—it’s the normalization of AI-interpreted labs before the visit even starts. Expect more patients to arrive with pre-digested explanations of their biomarkers. The differentiator for clinicians will be moving beyond interpretation to trajectory-level reasoning and personalized intervention.

Harvard University researchers debut an AI model predicting brain age, dementia risk, and cancer survival. The new system integrates imaging and clinical data to estimate biologic brain age and forecast long-term outcomes. Rather than flagging isolated abnormalities, it models where a patient sits along a risk trajectory. This represents the continued shift toward predictive, multimodal medicine—digital twin logic entering mainstream academia. For longevity-focused clinicians, the opportunity lies not in predicting decline, but in using these projections to alter slope early through metabolic, inflammatory, and lifestyle interventions.

A new study in NEJM AI explores the rise of agentic AI in clinical workflows. Beyond scribes and summarizers, agentic systems can retrieve data, draft plans, and initiate multi-step actions inside clinical environments. The promise is reduced cognitive load and automation of low-value tasks; the risk is over-reliance and opaque reasoning. The key takeaway: AI is moving from passive assistant to active operator. Practices adopting these systems will need clear human-in-the-loop guardrails to ensure augmentation—not abdication—of clinical judgment.

The Modern Clinician is written for functional, integrative, and longevity-focused physicians who want to scale their impact and deliver cutting-edge care.

If you liked this one, share it with a colleague! We appreciate you spreading the word.

To learn more about the why behind this newsletter, start with our first post introducing The Modern Clinician.